And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.
Mark 16:15 King James Bible

петък, 20 януари 2017 г.

Trump inauguration - "He will not divide us"

Behold, a protesting movement against Trump. It really seems this guy is some  part of an elaborate magic ritual, or just a jab at the Lord and the Bible, a dummy for target practice, anyway, who knows what these crazy satanists believe when they set up these "kings". They openly worship him as an infant and crucified, to deceive as many as possible, but secretly hate him and manifest this malice in propping up flesh and blood dummies of his regal and heavenly aspect.

Commencing at 9am on January 20, 2017, the day of the inauguration of the 45th (9x5 theses) President of the United States, the public is invited to deliver the words "HE WILL NOT DIVIDE US" into a camera mounted on a wall outside the Museum of the Moving Image, New York, repeating the phrase as many times, and for as long as they wish.

Open to all, 24 hours a day, seven days a week, the participatory performance will be live-streamed continuously for four years, or the duration of the presidency. In this way, the mantra "HE WILL NOT DIVIDE US" acts as a show of resistance or insistence, opposition or optimism, guided by the spirit of each individual participant and the community.

The greatest divider? The Gospel message and Jesus Christ.

Matthew 10:34 
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.

Luke 2:43
this child is set for the fall and rising again of many in Israel; and for a sign which shall be spoken against;

 John 7:43
So there was a division among the people
because of him.

сряда, 18 януари 2017 г.

Donald Trump and the Book of Revelation part 2

 Trump is not "the last Trump", (a belief so absurd, it is almost laughable) neither a protector against antichrist, he is a Satanic caricature of Jesus. On the 21st of January 2017, his first day in office, Trump will be 70 years, 7 months and 7 days old.

Donald Trump was asked to name one of his heroes. His answer was very, very strange.

So, lets break down Trump's comment. First, as is here, Trump never answers straightforwardly. He produces a stream of thought, going away from the question. This is similar to how Jesus would answer with a series of  increasingly removed thoughts, sometimes completely unrelated the original question.

Now lets compare this answer to Jesus's answers with the Pharisees in the gospel of John.

- "I've learned a lot from my father"

- for my Father is greater than I. John 14:28

- "my father was a builder  ..... I learned a lot about negotiations from my father" 

- ..the words that I speak unto you I speak not of myself: but the Father that dwelleth in me, he doeth the works. John 14:10

-"When I was three months into the campaign they added it up I had three months of experience and the 17 guys I was running against had 236 years, when you add 20 and 30 years...."

Why would he mention 20 and 30 years, when he just talked about hundreds of years and months? Maybe because he is referencing the 50 years that the Pharisees looked for in a person in order for him to give counsel? Three months experience versus three years of Jesus' ministry. Notice how Trump defeated the much more experienced republican politicians in the campaign struggle, much like Jesus preached as early as 12 years of age to the amazement of the teachers at the synagogue and later confounded and shamed the scribes and Pharisees without having higher learning.

-And the Jews marvelled, saying, How knoweth this man letters, having never learned? John 7:15

-Then said the Jews unto him, Thou art not yet fifty years old, and hast thou seen Abraham? John 8:57


 1. That Trump represents the archon might be deduced by the frequent remarks that he is childish by the media and himself:  "I've been 'a little childish'" And by the size of his fingers . . . . .

2. Trump's bright blond hair could be an allusion to the golden crowned Son of man of Revelation 14:14

3. Trump is unchanging, like Jesus

"Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever." Heb 13:8

"I have always been the same person-remain true to self.The media wants me to change but it would be very dishonest to supporters to do so! Donald J. Trump@realDonaldTrump
Aug 14 "

4. Trump uses the word "win" liberally, much like Jesus speaks of "overcoming" in his admonitions in the first three chapters of revelation.

5. Trump tells it like it is, like Jesus spoke "plainly" to his followers, but the media is perplexed with his comments, like Jesus spoke to the unbelieving masses in parables.


6.  Trump promises to build a wall to keep all un-american people outside the US and shut the mouth of "the lying media", This is reminiscent of the new Jerusalem of Revelation 21-22, which will be free of gentiles and liars (false christians/jews). Goebels also used the term, and the Nazis set out to start a 1000 year reign.

Donald Trump and the book of Revelation

вторник, 17 януари 2017 г.

Putin has spoken

Putin: I don’t know Trump personally, have no grounds to attack or protect him

Russian President Vladimir Putin said he has no grounds to attack or protect US President-elect Donald Trump, since he does not know him personally. He also said he has no justification to apply to the Nobel Committee to seek any kind of award from Trump.

"I don't know Mr. Trump personally, I have never met him and don't know what he will do on the international arena. So I have no grounds to attack him or criticize him for anything, or protect him or whatever," Putin said.

 How about collaborating with Trump? There can be a little wolf on the other side of the ocean, can't it? Remember, folks, because of the guardian's[and all other media] indirect expose of the stupidity of the intelligence services, we are led to believe that Trump and Putin are neutral towards each other, or somewhat friendly, but nothing deeper, option 1 "Putin blackmails Trump" ->false ->option 2 "There is nothing between them". From now anyone sniffing the supposed connection would be automatically discredited and not listened to.

Are you kidding me? You are kdidding me!

понеделник, 16 януари 2017 г.

The triumvirate which will ignite the world

Putin, trump and Erdogan will make countries great again  Alexander Dugin


Alexander Dugin on the working visit to Turkey during the winning trump in the US



That day when Donald trump won a crushing victory in the US, editor in chief of Constantinople, the philosopher Alexander Dugin was in Turkey on a working visit. In particular, attended the meeting with the Prime Minister of Turkey Binali Yildirim.

The Turkish media didn’t leave a visit without attention. Major publications wrote the following: “the political Scientist Alexander Dugin said that the President of Russia Vladimir Putin is ready to expand strategic partnerships and offers a hand of friendship to Turkey.” Other Newspapers noted that in meetings attended “the special envoy of Russia, Alexander Dugin”.
In the “Our view” Dugin shared his impressions about the trip and told about how Turkey has perceived the victory of Donald trump.

Daria Platonova: News of the victory trump has overtaken You not in Russia, in Turkey. What was your first reaction? And was the reaction of the Turkish people, those who were around you?
Alexander Dugin: You know, my reaction was delight. We did everything we could to objectively reflect the electoral campaign in the United States. And I never made a secret of personal sympathy for Donald Trump. And our channel, like our President, and the Patriotic society of Russia supported trump.
We resented the lies of the world media, the globalist media propagated about this campaign. So for me it was success, I would say – a personal victory and a victory of the country. In fact, a deeper understanding still lies ahead of us. This great event is the event that changed the structure of the world.
In Turkey was really interesting: I attended the extraordinary Congress of Turkey’s ruling party, met with Prime Minister Binali Yildirim. It is very interesting that took place two congresses. One of them is the ruling party, Erdogan, where I was also invited.

D. P.: Aleksandr gelevich, moreover, that we found the photographs in Turkish publications. Suddenly we upon request “Dugin” in the Turkish media began to find hundreds of pictures with the Prime Minister. And how he reacted to the election trump?

Ad: You know, I met him before. We talked about the other symbolic event. In Turkey now there is a strengthening of the Central government of Erdogan. He, in this case, is guided by a strong leader of our country, Vladimir Putin.
And held parallel to two of the Congress. The Congress of the ruling party and the opposition Congress party, where more than two dozen members of Parliament were arrested for suspicion of involvement in terrorist activities against the Turkish state. And, these are planted deputies, came to support the representatives of Western embassies.
A Congress of the ruling, the winning party, was shy of me, and it caused a tremendous wave of publications. Because Erdogan in his desire to strengthen Turkey in the national and opposition and liberation from the West, ultimately, withdrawal from NATO arrived to support the Russian delegation, with me there were several respected and important people, in particular, Oleg Vladimirovich Lebedev of United Russia and a number of other people.
We expressed our support for the Turkish people and the Turkish state. At a time when the West has expressed support, in fact, terrorists. And now the Turkish society saw the symbolism. Why are these photos that fill the Turkish press, they filled journals and publications on all tapes.

D. P.: Aleksandr gelevich, why do you think so much attention from the Turkish media?

Ad: I Have a lot of books out there, in Turkey know me as a representative of the Patriotic in terms of Russia, often ask for analysis. So, visit one of the Russian support for the ruling party outweighed the parish of all Western embassies that supported those forces that seek to destabilize Turkey.
So the Turks perceive the power of Russia. Just one man with a beard from Russia, well-known in Turkey and a frequent visitor to this country, in order to outweigh foreign diplomats. It was very symbolic. They say: better to let Turkey be a friend, but a man like Putin, like Russian than all these dubious Western partners who do not take us into Europe and create problems for us, supporting the Kurds, and so on.
After this wave of publications, when I was out on the street just all I got out of the hotel and there was a crowd of reporters who asked me, “Won the trump, what does that mean? What we, the Turks, now?” Because, – shouted someone from the crowd – you’ve long predicted that trump would win. Here we do not believe in it, and you were right”. Apparently, looking at Constantinople, and the site “Katechon” people in Turkey are reading.

I was amazed, actually, how deeply involved the Turkish community, journalists, politicians, policy in the work that we are here, representatives of conservative ideology.

DP: Probably, special attention has been given since the coup and attempts to overthrow Erdogan’s U.S. structures.

A. D.: I was just on that day, during the coup, Turkey…
But as for trump. The Turks were absolutely not ready for it, they believed the Western media. And so this crowd of journalists greeted me in the morning, after it became known that trump won.
Of course, my message was this: look, Putin, our President, has made Russia great. Trump, by Putin, is going to make America great. Your President Erdogan, there is only one to make again the great Turkey. And, of course, neither NATO nor the orientation to the West or attempts to break into Europe, where nobody waits for you, of course, are not the way [for Turkey]. The way is the strengthening of its sovereignty and Alliance with the great Russia, which our President has done great.

The Hill: Turkey is a strategically important partner of the United States

Meanwhile, the key advisers of President-elect Donald trump to publicly acknowledge the role of Turkey for the United States and oppose granting criminal Gulen asylum.
So, in the us political newspaper The Hill, Lieutenant-General Michael Flynn says that the United States is asked to issue a Turkish preacher, organizer of the coup attempt of Fethullah Gulen in Turkey. We will remind, at the moment, Gulen lives in the United States, in Pennsylvania, where he owns a chain of private schools.

The author emphasizes that Turkey is strategically the most important partner of the United States in the middle East, as well as the main ally in the fight against terrorists “Islamic State” (banned in Russia) in Iraq and Syria. However, the Obama administration preferred to keep Erdogan in the distance.

Assessment Flynn, the reason for the disagreement between Washington and Ankara became a criminal gülen, which the PA refuses to extradite. Moreover, Lieutenant-General draws attention to the relationship with the Fund Gulen Cosmos Foundation that supports its schools, and is also the main donor Fund for Clinton. In this regard, it is not surprising that bill Clinton once described Fethullah Gulen as a friend.
So, says Flynn, the United States should not provide refuge to Fethullah Gulen and remember who their “real friends”. Foreign policy must be adjusted to recognize the Turkey as a priority.

Thus, Trump's circle is already showing the correct orientation and emphasis in foreign policy. In addition, there was a potential threefold Alliance – Putin, trump, Erdogan – in which leaders are guided by national priorities and are capable of making the country great again.

четвъртък, 12 януари 2017 г.

Are you kidding me? You are kdidding me!

Trump was confronted in a briefing with a dossier by the CIA, which supposedly contained information on possibility of Russian blackmail against him through sex tapes, compromates etc, which turned out to be poorly substantiated and was immediately blasted by Trump (along with the CIA) as fake. This, along Russia's denial, serves to disperse suspicions that Trump and Russia are involved in a love-hate relationship in any way.

Trump blasts intel officials: 'Are we living in Nazi Germany?'

Whats more interesting is that the agent, who gathered the dubious info on Russian tensions with Trump, was the same guy who uncovered Russia's role in the Litvinenko hit.... The media, of course, quickly and generously supplied a biography of the MI6 agent, who was head of the bureau in Russia and, because bearing a personal grudge against Russia, was, in the mind of the reader, obviously trying to frame the Russian government at every opportunity.... So we are led to believe that Russia had no role in Litvinenko's hit! Watch how the media craftily dismantle his and the services' credibility and present Russia as innocent as well. This MI6 operative, Steele, must be a part of the greater psychodrama before the days of Litvvinenko, following orders from Moscow to suicide his credibility with this "dossier". What a dirty game of theater! ]

Donald Trump dossier: intelligence sources vouch for author's credibility

Ex-MI6 officer Christopher Steele, named as writer of Donald Trump memo, is ‘highly regarded professional’

His denials – at least some of them – were emphatic, even by the standards that Donald Trump has come to be judged by. The dossier, he said, was a confection of lies; he compared it to Nazi propaganda; it was fake news spread by sick people.

At his press briefing on Wednesday, the president-elect dared the world’s media to scrutinise the 35 pages of claims, before throwing down a challenge – where’s the proof? Nobody had any. Case closed.
But in the rush to trample all over the dossier and its contents, one key question remained. Why had America’s intelligence agencies felt it necessary to provide a compendium of the claims to Barack Obama and Trump himself?

And the answer to that lies in the credibility of its apparent author, the ex-MI6 officer Christopher Steele, the quality of the sources he has, and the quality of the people who were prepared to vouch for him. In all these respects, the 53-year-old is in credit.

On Thursday night, as the former spy was in hiding, having fled his home in the south-east of England, former colleagues rallied to defend him. One described him as “very credible” – a sober, cautious and meticulous professional with a formidable record.

The former Foreign Office official, who has known Steele for 25 years and considers him a friend, said: “The idea his work is fake or a cowboy operation is false – completely untrue. Chris is an experienced and highly regarded professional. He’s not the sort of person who will simply pass on gossip.”
The official added: “If he puts something in a report, he believes there’s sufficient credibility in it for it to be worth considering. Chris is a very straight guy. He could not have survived in the job he was in if he had been prone to flights of fancy or doing things in an ill-considered way.”

That is the way the CIA and the FBI, not to mention the British government, regarded him, too. It’s not hard to see why.

A Cambridge graduate, Steele was one of the more eminent Russia specialists for the Secret Intelligence Service (MI6). The Guardian understands that he focused on Soviet affairs after joining the agency, and spent two years living in Moscow in the early 1990s.
This was a period when Russia and the breakup of the eastern bloc were still the prime focus for Britain’s intelligence agencies, and a successful spell in the region was a good way to get on.
By all accounts, that’s exactly what Steele did. And his interest in Russia did not diminish as he continued to rise up the ranks, a friend and contemporary of Alex Younger – now head of MI6.

Over a career that spanned more than 20 years, Steele performed a series of roles, but always appeared to be drawn back to Russia; he was, sources say, head of MI6’s Russia desk. When the agency was plunged into panic over the poisoning of its agent Alexander Litvinenko in 2006, the then chief, Sir John Scarlett, needed a trusted senior officer to plot a way through the minefield ahead – so he turned to Steele. It was Steele, sources say, who correctly and quickly realised that Litvinenko’s death was a Russian state “hit”.
As good as he was, Steele was unlikely to get the top MI6 job, perhaps because his specialisms were not a priority in that period – Russian espionage was taking a back seat to Islamic terrorism and non-state threats. And, of course, there is money to be made in the private sector – lots of it, particularly in the past two years. He decided to quit the service in 2009.

As the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, exerted influence in all kinds of spheres, so Steele’s background made him hot property. Though he could not travel to Russia, he appears to have maintained his contacts and made new ones, using old-school techniques: going out, meeting people, shaking hands, making friends – and paying for information.


With his business partner, Chris Burrows, he set up the London-based company Orbis Business Intelligence, which was busy and expanding. Their operation would have been a good choice for anyone trying to gather intelligence about Russia and Trump.
It is unlikely that Steele would have had direct contact with the unnamed Kremlin officials who allegedly gave sensitive information on the president-elect. In fact, it’s believed the former spy hasn’t been able to visit Russia for more than 20 years. Rather, Steele would have tapped up his network of sources deep inside the country, some of them dating from his time there and others cultivated later, British officials suggested.
In turn, these individuals will have had sources of their own. Steele would likely have subcontracted some of his Trump investigation to trusted intermediaries in Moscow, who will have reported back to him via secure channels.

This method of intelligence collection may explain the odd language anomaly in the Trump dossier that emerged into the public eye late on Tuesday. In a September briefing note, Steele mentions the Alpha-Group, a reference to the consortium headed by the powerful oligarch Mikhail Fridman. The more usual English spelling is Alfa.
Almost certainly, a native Russian speaker wrote the original material, correctly transliterating the Russian “f” as “ph”. It was Steele’s job to collate, evaluate and verify this material before passing it to his American client Fusion GPS, a Washington-based political research firm. The company had been hired originally by one of Trump’s early Republican opponents before the contract was taken up by senior Democrats.

The Foreign Office official who spoke to the Guardian on Thursday acknowledged that the Steele dossier was not perfect. But he pointed out that intelligence reports always came with “gradations of veracity” and included phrases such as “a high degree of probability”. “You aren’t dealing with a binary world where you can say this is true and this isn’t,” the official said.
He added: “The strongest reason for giving this report credence is that intelligence professionals in the US take it seriously. They were sufficiently persuaded by the author’s track record to find the contents worth passing to the president and president-elect.”

The CIA and FBI will have taken various factors into consideration before deciding on its credibility. They could include Trump’s public comments during the campaign, when he urged Russia to hack Hillary Clinton’s emails. The agencies may also have classified, intercepted material provided by the National Security Agency and Britain’s GCHQ.

They must, equally, have considered whether some of the claims in the report might have been part of an elaborate Russian disinformation exercise.This is unlikely. The dossier is multi-dimensional, involving many different people, and many moving parts,” the official suggested.

Sadly, it was a misinformation exercise to help Trump. 

Steele’s personal views on Russia are unlikely to be very different from those of his former employers – or from those of a former UK ambassador to Moscow, who is understood to have passed the dossier to the Republican senator John McCain, who in turn passed it to the FBI.

MI6 has been privately warning that Putin, unchallenged by the west, has grown in confidence and, of course, that the Kremlin has targeted Trump. It would be odd if it hadn’t. The consensus among British securocrats is that “Putin is a wolf … and he preys on the weakest sheep.”

How about collaborating with Trump? There can be a little wolf on the other side of the ocean, can't it? Remember, folks, because of the guardian's indirect expose of the stupidity of the intelligence services, we are led to believe that Trump and Putin are neutral towards each other, or somewhat friendly, but nothing deeper, option 1 "Putin blackmails Trump" ->false ->option 2 "There is nothing between them". From now anyone sniffing the supposed connection would be automatically discredited and not listened to.

But intelligence is not evidence, and Steele would have known, better than anyone, that the information he was gathering was not fact and could be wrong. In the smoke-and-mirrors world of counterespionage, there are few certainties.
Those caveats do not appear on the documents – but they are given by Steele as a warning to prospective new clients.

Whether he could have imagined that a summary of his work would be used in this way is a moot point; Steele did not go to ground in the weeks before Christmas as US media outlets tried to stand up some of the claims against Trump. He was in London, thinking about where to take Orbis next, eating his favourite tapas and pottering around Victoria, the home of his newly refurbished office.
From Moscow’s perspective, the report’s publication can hardly be counted as a success. As a former KGB agent, Putin understands the first rule of intelligence: that special operations should remain secret. “In the world in which Putin operates, if people can see the strings, you’ve failed,” the Foreign Office official said. “The Russians will be asking: ‘How the hell did it get out?’”

 Actually, it is a great success from Moscow's perspective, because it was ordered by Putin. And yes, secrecy is important, but more important is shouting out lies publicly.... or exposing lies directed against yourself....which you planted. We are led to believe that its not that Russia does the whole thing through the british services, but that the services failed and Moscow laughs from the other side of the street.

The spotlight is certainly not something Steele was looking for. He is mainly distrustful of the media – he chooses who to speak to, having been let down, so he has confided to friends, by reporters working for a Sunday newspaper.
After a career in MI6, anonymity is something he has prized. He once asked a journalist if he had ever heard of him. The reporter’s reply was a decisive no. Steele was relieved: “That’s the way I like it.”
Now that his cover has been blown, his next steps are uncertain. The fact that Steele is a British citizen and an outed former MI6 officer makes him relatively secure from any act of Russian revenge. At the moment, the situation may look bleak for Steele. But things can change.

 To add more spice on the drama, the reader and viewer can now imagine themselves to be a part of the spy-movie, where agents' covers are blown. Steele, to cement the role, given to him by the Kremlin, may whisper "mission aborted" and run away from an angry bear. Give me a break.

“This will eventually blow over,” Steele’s friend said. “What you are left with is a effective marketing campaign. He’s a very sober guy, but he also has a sense of humour.”

Media has worked FOR Trump, not against him

Switching on the computer and browsing news pages, I can't escape the constant reminder by the so called alternative media, that the mainstream, legacy, liberal media is politically motivated against Trump.

But if that was the case why would they use unverifiable sources or plain rumours to attack Trump at the last possible moment or rather after he has already been elevated to presidential status? In the era of the internet checking whether a source is genuine is a click away and Trump has been vindicated now how many times against slanders and half-baked news? How can a political attack be so uncalculated and so not tought through? How can the mainstream news channels expose themselves as phoneys so hard? This proves that the media, which attacked Trump and actually gave him more credibility than anything, is politically motivated by the sinister force of eurasianism.

сряда, 11 януари 2017 г.

USA - Land of confusion

With Trump Putin won and the world lost. You cannot deny that Russia played her cards well. The USA has for a long time been under the sways of the dialectic of the KGB and this has led to a complete confusion in the mind of the simple american. Nothing in the USA is "normal" or per the definition anymore. Not conservatism, not socialism, not to speak of liberalism. The values, upon which the USA was founded, free speech, free enterprise, limited government are despised and considered degenerate, by the warped concept "liberal" and the counter attack on the Trump-exposing media.

The american "patriots" were given a poisonous bread crumb by the KGB. They were told that Russia used the Democrats in the USA to implement their final goal of "communism", whereas nothing could be further from the truth, because their plan was using the right, to bring about totalitarianism, which the USSR's "communism" was. . . . Watch as this "KGB defector" Yuri Bezmenov laughs and smirks as he is explaining the subversive tactics of the USSR, but cleverly omits the fact that the USSR was working on both sides - left and right! He isn't laughing, because the subject matter is funny, but because he knows americans will believe him and will stare at the red flag, like they believed every story they have been told. In this video he is being active more than ever, leading the listeners on a dark path.

The trump-led republican party actually resembles the communist party in soviet Russia more than anything. It suffices to say that it is supposedly fighting for the down-trodden common American man, the worker, the proletariat, only not in distributing what was unlawfuly taken from him by the bourgeois, but in protecting his "rightful" private profit. Not that it is actually pursuing that, it just uses the appeal of the ideology to elevate a totalitarian dictatorship, and it has achieved it with Trump. The goal of the communist party has never been textbook egalitarianism, it is thinly veiled fascism and dictatorship. In the USSR, there has never been such a thing as equality, it has always been brutal Russism and imperialism. In order to achieve this in the USA, they had to create a personality cult, based on the new american "values", "values" promulgated by the ideology of Ayn Rand and others - the american idolatry of selfishness and success. This hyper-capitalistic mindset is behind both the xenophobic paranoia, that every illegal migrant is a thief, and the personality cult of DJP, that a narcissistic and self-absorbed bully is an ideal.

This is fomented in the religious dimension (which is important for america) by dispensationalism (which says that USA is God's nation by defending Israel, a mis-reading of Genesis 12:3),  basically a frankenstein monster theology, made up of the worst parts of calvinism and free-willism on the other hand, with its faulty exegesis shifts spiritual blessings into material, because it interprets Old Testament material promises as valid for today and rabid hyper-capitalism takes these limited blessings and sets a perimeter around them, with a Lord Protector to safeguard them against "socialism" or foreign interest. So what was spiritual, is now fleshly and material.  Galatians 3:3. This is completely non-biblical. Biblical blessings are mostly spiritual and are supposed to be dispensed/distributed (although not equally) among the members of the church in the entire world. Furthermore, God provides enough for those, who spread material blessings to others in need. (2 Cor 9:8). So the American God is not the God of the bible.

American christians claim that literally anyone, through his own effort, without help of the government, can become rich, living the american dream, like they claim that literally anyone can get saved by his own decision and power. To that they add calvinistic dispensationalism of a "chosen people" to say that only they as a nation deserve those material blessings.   Satan is smart and has made the nation once made up of poor and strangers despise the poor and the stranger. Claiming they are "one nation under God" they have blasphemed and taken God's name in vain, for who is that God, who leaves helpless, depraved sinners to themselves and helpless, deprived poor men to themselves?

Exodus 23:9
Also thou shalt not oppress a stranger: for ye know the heart of a stranger, seeing ye were strangers in the land of Egypt.

The dichotomy that you must be either absolutely selfish or have no personal property is deeply embedded in the american mind from the time of the october revolution. This total denial of altruism has destroyed Christianity in America and turned it into a financial enterprise. Many churches in the USA truly despise the poor and believe that they deserve their plight. Americans love their money so much, that they are ready to elect a sell-out dictator to protect them.  Selfish capitalism is condemned in the Bible:

Israel is an empty vine, he bringeth forth fruit unto himself: according to the multitude of his fruit he hath increased the altars; according to the goodness of his land they have made goodly images.                               Hosea 10:1

"for whosoever hath, to him shall be given; and whosoever hath not, from him shall be taken even that which he seemeth to have."                                   Luke 8:18

The american proletariat are spiritually and morally bankrupt and confused out of their wits. This is a sign of judgment. No, America will not be judged only for homosexuals and abortion, but for its selfishness and fear of man.

Isaiah 29:9 Stay yourselves, and wonder; cry ye out, and cry: they are drunken, but not with wine; they stagger, but not with strong drink. 
10 For the LORD hath poured out upon you the spirit of deep sleep, and hath closed your eyes: the prophets and your rulers, the seers hath he covered.

неделя, 8 януари 2017 г.

Council of Trent of the Devil

The theology of the council of Trent on justification and grace is the theology of arminianism and modern evangelicalism. If you extract certain statements on here and sermonize them, you get evangelical "preaching". These doctrines give men false hope in their experiences and prayers, they destroy grace, true hope, thankfulness and a true sense of sin and trust on the Lord to remove it.

Preparationism, decisionism and the like are derived from Catholic teaching and run contrary to the word of God, which declares that we were born again according to the will of God John 1:13; James 1:18. It is not simply a matter of "works versus faith" it is about who is saving whom, and if we leave the slightest door to human cooperation, we enter into dangerous territory. Grace is to be understood as an unreturnable, irrevocable gift.

Plain experience in preaching the gospel teaches us that people, who once rebelled against God and his Christ are suddenly "broken" and won over by the power of the gospel. Even an  preacher who believes in free will will acknowledge this, if he has truly preached the gospel among sinners. There is no anticipation or human disposition as the Spirit falls on men. John 3:8. This is part of grace and it doesn't fit with the procedure of the decisionist evangelicals, who claim to "lead people to the Lord", while the only thing that can truly lead a person to the truth is the Holy Ghost John 16. Human persuasion can, at most, bring a person to an intellectual assent, but can never change his heart. But the Holy Ghost is stronger than Satan and can pull down his fortresses at once. The battle for souls is not decided by the captives, or the field.

"But where sin abounded, grace did much more abound:"
Romans 5:20

"They also that erred in spirit shall come to understanding, and they that murmured shall learn doctrine."
Isaiah 29:24
Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ. 2 Cor 10:5
As soon as they hear of me, they shall obey me: the strangers shall submit themselves unto me.  The strangers shall fade away, and be afraid out of their close places. Psalm 18:44-45

Where the word of a king is, there is power.  Ecclesiastes 8:4 

Thy people shall be willing in the day of thy power, Psalms 110:3

They shall speak of the glory of thy kingdom, and talk of thy power Psalms 145:11

For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek.
Romans 1:16

         THE COUNCIL OF TRENT Session VI - Celebrated on the thirteenth day of January,  
                  1547 under Pope Paul III

        CHAPTER V

        It is furthermore declared that in adults the beginning of that justification must proceed from the predisposing grace of God through Jesus Christ, that is, from His vocation, whereby, without any merits on their part, they are called; that they who by sin had been cut off from God, may be disposed through His quickening and helping grace to convert themselves to their own justification by freely assenting to and cooperating with that grace; so that, while God touches the heart of man through the illumination of the Holy Ghost, man himself neither does absolutely nothing while receiving that inspiration, since he can also reject it, nor yet is he able by his own free will and without the grace of God to move himself to justice in His sight.




        Whence also they hear immediately the word of Christ:
        If thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.[42]

        This disposition or preparation is followed by justification itself, which is not only a remission of sins but also the sanctification and renewal of the inward man through the voluntary reception of the grace and gifts whereby an unjust man becomes just and from being an enemy becomes a friend, that he may be an heir according to hope of life everlasting.[30]

        For God does not command impossibilities, but by commanding admonishes thee to do what thou canst and to pray for what thou canst not, and aids thee that thou mayest be able.[58]


        No one, moreover, so long as he lives this mortal life, ought in regard to the sacred mystery of divine predestination, so far presume as to state with absolute certainty that he is among the number of the predestined,[74] as if it were true that the one justified either cannot sin any more, or, if he does sin, that he ought to promise himself an assured repentance.
        For except by special revelation, it cannot be known whom God has chosen to Himself.

 Canon 4. If anyone says that man's free will moved and aroused by God, by assenting to God's call and action, in no way cooperates toward disposing and preparing itself to obtain the grace of justification, that it cannot refuse its assent if it wishes, but that, as something inanimate, it does nothing whatever and is merely passive, let him be anathema.

Canon 5. If anyone says that after the sin of Adam man's free will was lost and destroyed, or that it is a thing only in name, indeed a name without a reality, a fiction introduced into the Church by Satan, let him be anathema.

Canon 9.If anyone says that the sinner is justified by faith alone,[114] meaning that nothing else is required to cooperate in order to obtain the grace of justification, and that it is not in any way necessary that he be prepared and disposed by the action of his own will, let him be anathema.

Canon 11.If anyone says that men are justified either by the sole imputation of the justice of Christ or by the sole remission of sins, to the exclusion of the grace and the charity which is poured forth in their hearts by the Holy Ghost,[116] and remains in them, or also that the grace by which we are justified is only the good will of God, let him be anathema.

Canon 16.If anyone says that he will for certain, with an absolute and infallible certainty, have that great gift of perseverance even to the end, unless he shall have learned this by a special revelation,[120] let him be anathema.

Canon 17.If anyone says that the grace of justification is shared by those only who are predestined to life, but that all others who are called are called indeed but receive not grace, as if they are by divine power predestined to evil, let him be anathema.

Canon 18. If anyone says that the commandments of God are, even for one that is justified and constituted in grace,[121] impossible to observe, let him be anathema.

петък, 6 януари 2017 г.

Romans 9

1 I say the truth in Christ, I lie not, my conscience also bearing me witness in the Holy Ghost, 
2 That I have great heaviness and continual sorrow in my heart. 
3 For I could wish that myself were accursed from Christ for my brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh: 
4 Who are Israelites; to whom pertaineth the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, and the promises; 
5 Whose are the fathers, and of whom as concerning the flesh Christ came, who is over all, God blessed for ever. Amen. 
6 Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel:

14 What shall we say then? Is there unrighteousness with God? God forbid. 
15 For he saith to Moses,
I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion.

Paul expresses his heartfelt desire to have his Israelite brethren saved in the same chapter, where God's election is revealed, because God must have the right and glory and dignity above our emotions. So we will cry and pray (but a person who believes in free will if he is consistent should not pray on bit), but not refuse and demean the will of God, much less blame him, like those brethren did by saying "who has resisted his will". 

That there is even one saved sinner is a pure miracle and a gigantic expression of God as a loving God. We are at peace with the world and can't comprehend the chasm, the great distance and enmity between fallen man and God, so think it proper and reasonable that he would want to save all, but this is a human point of view and very defective for several reasons. Arminians severely underestimate the extent of the fall and say that there must be something from God's image deserving respect and good will, but God's image in man is only a vestige and corrupted by the Devil. Consequently in their twisted view the redemptive work is very minimal or non-existent altogether, the reconciliation simple and initiated by man, but the Bible teaches otherwise Romans 5:6-10. God's great condescension is his taking upon a likeness of the sinful flesh, because man had fallen so low, he couldn't even think of anything agreeable to God Romans 8:1-8. Otherwise how could man be said to be an enemy of God? He is not an enemy through work and act only, but in constitution, as scripture reveals. The fall is a great catastrophic event that completely changed visible and invisible creation, and the restitutive, redemptive work of Jesus Christ, the creator Col 1:14-22, on the cross is a great removal of the effects of the fall, but not in the entire creation, because most of it will burn in God's wrath. What is that power in our will to effect or affect any of this, I ask? Jesus' work is complete.  God didn't reveal the full implications of the fall in his short condemnation in Genesis, because Adam and Eve, with their new depraved minds, wouldn't be able to take it or rather would have sunk in horrible despair for themselves and their posterity. It was enough that they "should die" and have pains, this confrontation with God, this contrast with their previous condition, this for them was the revelation of their "total depravity", the personal horror of alienation from God, with the conclusion that a burning sword stood in the way back.  We have the Bible, speaking of God's holiness and perfections and our misery, to show how far off we have fallen, but we are not in the perfection of God with his omniscience and justice, so we can't know the full depth of our wretchedness and unworthiness and how his pardon and justification in Christ is an unthinkable display of love and mercy Romans 5:7-8

The mental projection of an all-loving God is an idol, which must be torn down, for it is not real and revealed in Scripture, for an All-loving God would not suspend his omnipotence and omniscience to leave sinful and ignorant people to themselves. If I had a friend and I knew that he would make a fatal choice, and I loved him and was within my power to convince him to make the right choice and be saved, if I didn't use my power and influence to dissuade him, how can I say that i love him, when i leave him to die by his folly? For once and for all we should understand that God owes us nothing.

Those, whom God loves with an everlasting love will be drawn into that love. The divine order precludes and human initiative or knowledge.

Jeremiah 31:3
The LORD hath appeared of old unto me, saying, Yea, I have loved thee with an everlasting love: therefore with lovingkindness have I drawn thee.

Therefore, all are not drawn. For if all were drawn, all would be loved everlastingly, and how is God's love everlasting towards them, who will spend an eternity in Hell and are called cursed workers of iniquity etc, even before their entry into Hell? When does God's love cease to be everlasting for them? Is it love, when it can be rejected and is conditional?  God has no conditional love. But we know God loved us and many others, to whom we must labour to get the good news of their salvation, so that at the end of the world, as it is written in the book of Revelation we may all rejoice at our salvation and the destruction of the enemies of God.

 3 Among whom also we all had our conversation in times past in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind; and were by nature the children of wrath, even as others.
4 But God, who is rich in mercy, for his great love wherewith he loved us,
5 Even when we were dead in sins, hath quickened us together with Christ, (by grace ye are saved;)

If God loves someone with his eternal love, he will resurrect him, like Lazarus. He won't "offer" him salvation, he won't "try" to convince him, he will raise him from the dead as he is- stinking, cold, non-responsive.

 The divine order in eternity and time is the opposite of our perceived order.

He loved us, then we loved him. (1 John 4:16-19)
He called us, then we called upon his name. (1 Cor 1:24; Rom 8:29-31)
He chose us, then we chose him. (John 15; 1 Thess 1:4,9)
He turned us, then we turned to him. (Jeremiah 31:18)
He put his fear in us, then we feared him. (Jeremiah 32:40)

So many wonderful gifts, all from the merit of Christ and grace of God! May he bestow them on many more!

четвъртък, 5 януари 2017 г.

Matthew 23:37

Matthew 23:37, “O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together … and ye would not.”

A verse very different from what arminians imagine it to be, (ab)using it to show that God wanted to save the entire population of Jerusalem, but without warrant, as the verse itself doesn't relay that at all. It doesn't say "how often would I have gathered thee", but "thy children". Jesus wasn't "trying" to save the entirety of the populace, and they refused through their free will. The verse carries nothing of this.
Jesus was talking to Jerusalem, the apostate rulership of Jerusalem, not the average citizen, much less those, whom he wants to save. Why would he suddenly interrupt his own rebuke and address the common people? The whole Matthew 23 is a condemnation on the leaders, the Jewish clerical elite of the city. Does this verse say that God's prophets attempted to save the rulers? The goal of the prophetic ministry was to gather "the children", the godly citizens from their oppressive clergy and rulers, like Jeroboam, Ahab, Jezebel, Ahaz, Manasseh and the hosts of false prophets etc. It was them, who didn't want to release the common men to their God and killed the prophets so that nobody could hear the word of God and his promises for temporal and eternal salvation.

To which may be added the following passage of Isaiah, to throw more light on the meaning of the verse.

Isaiah 49:24-25

Shall the prey be taken from the mighty, or the lawful captive delivered?

But thus saith the LORD, Even the captives of the mighty shall be taken away, and the prey of the terrible shall be delivered: for I will contend with him that contendeth with thee, and I will save thy children.

The primary application of this verse is the deliverance from the hard bondage of Satan, in which he takes every person born into the world, including God's people, the elect, which makes them temporarily liable to judgment, that is, in a sense, his "lawful captives" as far as they are under his dominion and condemnation.

But it has a local application here in that the Pharisees and the priesthood of Israel had turned into the slave-drivers of Satan, much like Pharaoh, bringing anyone born within their realm into spiritual bondage and refusing to give up their presumed lawful right over the souls of the people to the God-sent prophets and then apostles and disciples. They thought that, because they can trace their office and lineage back to Moses, they have rights over people's souls, much like today's "apostolic" churches abuse the names and authority of the apostles. But Jesus promised to "contend with him that contendeth with thee" and here he does, contending with the Pharisees for the souls of those sons and daughters of Abraham, who were oppressed by the Devil. He also promised to "save thy children", which he did, when he removed the ceremonial law and destroyed Jerusalem, thus freeing the Christians from the bondage of the priesthood. Matthew 24:13,22

Matthew 23:2 Saying The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat:
4 For they bind heavy burdens and grievous to be borne, and lay them on men's shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers.

Isaiah 49:24
Shall the prey be taken from the mighty, or the lawful captive delivered?

Matthew 23:23 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone.

 The chicks were never unwilling and the wolves were never willing.

Psalms 36:7
How excellent is thy lovingkindness, O God! therefore the children of men put their trust under the shadow of thy wings.

сряда, 4 януари 2017 г.

Heart issues 2

 God would be perfectly just and righteous if he didn't send his Son to save even one sinner. No sinner deserves salvation, neither an offer to salvation, no, not even the common things of providence.  I'd be wary of calling God a debtor, for he owes nobody nothing, but we are eternal and infinite debtors. You are blaspheming God, when saying he can't conceive a way, in which he uses and , praise the Lord, repairs his creation the best way possible. You are denying him rights to use his providential power in his more treasured creation - man. Is main omniscient, omnipotent or all-wise, or stronger than the Devil? Then he must be subject to the one who is. And God has special thoughts for that part of his creation.

One day all will cast their crowns of free-will or "good hearts" before the Lord and there will be no questions asked.

11 Thou art worthy, O Lord, to receive glory and honour and power: for thou hast created all things, and for thy pleasure they are and were created.

12 Saying with a loud voice, Worthy is the Lamb that was slain to receive power, and riches, and wisdom, and strength, and honour, and glory, and blessing.

And yet he is not worthy to receive power over our will?


17 O LORD, why hast thou made us to err from thy ways, and hardened our heart from thy fear? Return for thy servants' sake, the tribes of thine inheritance.

The why here has nothing to do with God changing. God doesn't repent or withhold his promised good, although it may seem so at the surface. David asked the same

"Psalms 77:9
Hath God forgotten to be gracious? hath he in anger shut up his tender mercies? Selah."

But then David realises where his fear comes from:

"10 And I said, This is my infirmity:"

The "Why" is therefore a cry out of weakness, which leads to doubt, human and one that God has favour towards. Now, God is unchangeable and doesn't repent of promises and gifts, which may be hidden from us and the good delayed for a while.

19 God is not a man, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent: hath he said, and shall he not do it? or hath he spoken, and shall he not make it good?

God does nothing without a purpose, but blesses us with being participants in his Holy and Good purpose. In fact it is this his quality that prevents him from acutally punishing us for our sin accordingly. His mercy is everlasting, because he is unchangeable.

Malachi 3:6
For I am the LORD, I change not; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed.

Once again, the issue at the heart of the issue is the wicked human heart. This intercessory prayer cannot come from an unbelieving heart. If this prayer was from the lips of an apostate or ungodly Israelite, God would have not heard it for a second. The "hardened" ones are the past generations, also, surely the prophet isn't referring to himself, but talks collectively, like in Isaiah 53 and 59 and almost everywhere else. He is laying down the prayer that those who are turned by God will direct at their Lord.

Proverbs 1:28
Then shall they call upon me, but I will not answer; they shall seek me early, but they shall not find me:

Proverbs 28:9
He that turneth away his ear from hearing the law, even his prayer shall be abomination.

God will only answer a repentant heart, one, which his Spirit has crushed and mashed and infused with grace. Solomon was prophetically aware that one day the nation of Israel will take those steps back or ever beyond their captivity and go into idolatry and, consequent to their failure to maintain the Mosaic covenant, be scattered among the nations. But he also knew that God would not fail his promises, including the one in Deuteronomy, where God promises to give to many of them a new heart and so they would be somewhat restored. This was fulfilled partially in the days of the Babylonian captivity and the Greek invasion and will be fulfilled fully, with the heavenly kingdom, when all the Jews get saved.

Remember, this is not conditioned on anything, this is the new covenant, God performed it, Christ procured it, the Holy Ghost dispenses it and by the merits of Christ we are made partakers of its benefits, chiefly the change of heart.

6 And the LORD thy God will circumcise thine heart, and the heart of thy seed, to love the LORD thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, that thou mayest live.

8 And thou shalt return and obey the voice of the LORD, and do all his commandments which I command thee this day.

1 Kings 8
48 And so return unto thee with all their heart, and with all their soul, in the land of their enemies, which led them away captive, and pray unto thee toward their land, which thou gavest unto their fathers, the city which thou hast chosen, and the house which I have built for thy name:
49 Then hear thou their prayer and their supplication in heaven thy dwelling place, and maintain their cause,

56 Blessed be the LORD, that hath given rest unto his people Israel, according to all that he promised: there hath not failed one word of all his good promise , which he promised by the hand of Moses his servant.
58 That he may incline our hearts unto him, to walk in all his ways, and to keep his commandments, and his statutes, and his judgments, which he commanded our fathers.

Jeremiah 29: 13 And ye shall seek me, and find me, when ye shall search for me with all your heart.

So it is not only a pure and broken heart, but also the whole heart.  Shall they call upon the Lord with the whole of their wicked hearts, out of which all kinds of lawlessness and evil outpours (Mark 7; Genesis 6:5)? No, from their new hearts, which God has promised to give them through the circumcision without hands and the operation of the faith of God. Colossians 2:12. This must absolutely precede the heart-felt sincere prayer, which God will hear and is a singular and personal work of God. A fish will sooner jump out of water than a sinner out of his hardened and unrepentant sinful condition. And it all begins in the mind, or, biblically said, the heart.

Proverbs 23:7
For as he thinketh in his heart, so is he:

Proverbs 15:26
The thoughts of the wicked are an abomination to the LORD: but the words of the pure are pleasant words.

Those, who call upon the name of the Lord with this pure and broken and single heart are bound to be saved, they can do no else and their prayer will be accepted. Lord, to whom shall we go? thou hast the words of eternal life. John 6:68.  Whom have I in heaven but thee? and there is none upon earth that I desire beside thee. Ps 73:25.  Acts 15:9 And put no difference between us and them, purifying their hearts by faith.

David and Paul knew that the Lord had a purpose for them, before they even knew them:

Ps 71:6 By thee have I been holden up from the womb: thou art he that took me out of my mother's bowels: my praise shall be continually of thee.
Galatians 1:15 But when it pleased God, who separated me from my mother's womb, and called me by his grace,16 To reveal his Son in me, that I might preach him among the heathen; immediately I conferred not with flesh and blood:

Acts 22:14 And he said, The God of our fathers hath chosen thee, that thou shouldest know his will, and see that Just One, and shouldest hear the voice of his mouth. 

(This was not only Paul's service appointment, but his salvific experience. He was chosen to be saved and become an apostle at the same time)

вторник, 3 януари 2017 г.

Missionaries etc.

It would be indeed heartless and evil to NOT preach the gospel to anyone who would listen, because God has men everywhere, of every station, of every age, of every race, of every nation, and if we say he doesn't we are liars and do not know the Saviour of the world. John 4. Many missionaries were predestinarian e.g. William Carey and many others. There were also calvinist preachers, who preached predestination and people got saved at the same sermon. People get saved with non-calvinist preaching, no denying of that.

But there is a proper missionary activity and an improper one. The improper one consists in trying, by all means (not that we shouldn't use means) to make people go to church and raise their hand, walk up to the altar or say a prayer after a 2-3 minute conversation.  This is called "easy believism", free-will doctrine taken to an extreme, and is very dangerous, because it gives those "converts" a false sense of security from their own decision or little prayer, but those people, while interested for a while and assent to the doctrines of the gospel, fall off and have never repented. Some missionaries nevertheless do this car salesman approach to get support, because their funding is based on their success , many also do it for their own glory Phil 1, and some really do it honestly, but it is futile, because it puts too much stress on a short experience and ignores repentance and discipleship. The Bible teaches us to plant, water and wait for fruit James 5. There needs to be a lot of teaching, preaching and praying to get people into the faith, whether or not you believe in free will or universal atonement. Some may get saved from a single sermon, but that is very rare.

RE: Jesus died for the elect. This doctrine is misunderstood or viewed from the wrong angle. Jesus died for MANY, for millions upon millions.That is comforting. It is not as if he died for no one. But if we say that he died for every single person, we don't improve the situation either here on earth or at the judgment, when most will go to hell, one bit, because when a person is saved its because he believes Jesus died for him, a sinner, not for every single person, thus at the time of conversion he is "limiting" the atonement to himself, he isn't thinking about chances, whether or not he is among the elect, but he KNOWS Jesus died for him. Furthermore, many believe that because Christ died for ALL, God will somehow save them in the end and they dont need to repent and thus perish. If it is up to me, I can delay till my deathbed and then accept Christ and repent etc.

Then we arrive at the next pitfall - If God loves all and is Omnipotent, why doesnt he save them all? He tells us to love in deed and truth, but if we say he loves all and he doesnt do all to save them, how is that real love? We are left with an even more troubling question. The reality is that most will go to Hell. It is a terrible notion that part of God's love consists of leaving men to decide. Even if it was up to them, most will reject it, so how unwise is that from God?  But if we say he loves SOME or MANY and has actually done all to save them, and we ourselves put effort to be part of the salvation process of these people, like Paul (who knew God will not save all, but at least some, probably many) and "endured all things for the elect's sakes, that they may also obtain the salvation which is in Christ Jesus with eternal glory.", and " I am made all things to all men, that I might by all means save some." and we patiently wait for the word to take root and the elect to manifest the love of God and grace of Christ,  then we are satisfied and leave the rest to the will of God.

When we limit the atonement, we only limit its extent, not its power. Because Jesus actually, utterly, and to the end has destroyed the reign of Satan, the works of the Devil, the handwriting of ordinances against us, the wrath of God and both Deaths, including the special works of Satan, pride and unbelief 2 Cor 4:4. "It is all finished" He is the author and finisher of our faith. As the scars of Jesus removed the unbelief of Thomas, his wounds, which bled 2000 years ago will remove the unbelief of the souls of those, who are sprinkled by the Holy Ghost. 

Limiting the atonement isn't limiting our preaching, prayer or hope, to the contrary, who would want to stop using this power and seeing the love of God come into effect, but if we say he died for all and we are to decide, we "make the cross of none effect", or at least put a little stumblingblock to it, because we leave that last step to man, without knowing if he is honest, ready or even able to take that step. But he will be and will make it with no doubt or fear in his heart, if God has done his work in him, so we don't need to rush things and deceive people with "making a decision". God will do his will in his appointed time. As long as we sow and water, the fruit will come.

Old heart - new heart

Proverbs 28:26
He that trusteth in his own heart is a fool:

Jeremiah 17:9
The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?


36:25 Then will I sprinkle clean water upon you, and ye shall be clean: from all your filthiness, and from all your idols, will I cleanse you.  

26 A new heart also will I give you, and a new spirit will I put within you: and I will take away the stony heart out of your flesh, and I will give you an heart of flesh

Luke 8:15
But that on the good ground are they, which in an honest and good heart, having heard the word, keep it, and bring forth fruit with patience.
Col 2:12 Buried with him in baptism, wherein also ye are risen with him through the faith of the operation of God, who hath raised him from the dead.

1 Peter 2:10
Which in time past were not a people, but are now the people of God: which had not obtained mercy, but now have obtained mercy.

2 Peter 1:1
Simon Peter, a servant and an apostle of Jesus Christ, to them that have obtained like precious faith with us

Romans 9

23 And that he might make known the riches of his glory on the vessels of mercy, which he had afore prepared unto glory,
30 What shall we say then? That the Gentiles, which followed not after righteousness, have attained to righteousness, even the righteousness which is of faith.

понеделник, 2 януари 2017 г.

Isaiah 65's choosing

12 Therefore will I number you to the sword, and ye shall all bow down to the slaughter: because when I called, ye did not answer; when I spake, ye did not hear; but did evil before mine eyes, and did choose that wherein I delighted not. 
 13 Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD, Behold, my servants shall eat, but ye shall be hungry: behold, my servants shall drink, but ye shall be thirsty: behold, my servants shall rejoice, but ye shall be ashamed:

  This passage from Isaiah does speak of choosing and rejecting, but in no way about FREE choosing or rejecting.The source of their wicked choosing is introduced at the very beginning of the chapter:

2 I have spread out my hands all the day unto a rebellious people, which walketh in a way that was not good, after their own thoughts;
The cause of their rejection of God is clear, they have followed their own thoughts/ hearts. And man's thoughts and heart are NEVER aligned with Gods:

Isaiah 55:9
For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts.

But in the first verse God is talking about another type of people who were walking after their own thoughts, the Gentiles.

1 I am sought of them that asked not for me; I am found of them that sought me not: I said, Behold me, behold me, unto a nation that was not called by my name.

The gist of this is that no one by nature OR the law (Romans 2) seeks God, Jews or Gentiles, Romans 3:9,11.

Proverbs 16:1
The preparations of the heart in man, and the answer of the tongue, is from the LORD.

Proverbs 19:3
The foolishness of man perverteth his way: and his heart fretteth against the LORD.

Proverbs 20:9
Who can say, I have made my heart clean, I am pure from my sin?
Ephesians 4:18
Having the understanding darkened, being alienated from the life of God through the ignorance that is in them, because of the blindness of their heart:

Such a man, who will seek the living God cannot be found anywhere on the globe, but God draws and changes the hearts of the Gentiles and Jews and they become "seekers". This is achieved by another kind of calling, the effectual calling, not the calling of Matthew 22:14 and Isaiah 65:12, where many are called, but few chosen, which is the AUDIBLE voice of the Gospel, to which all men are impervious, but an opening of the heart Acts 16, the exchange of the heart, through which God is able to turn a man unto himself with the power of the convicting Holy Ghost. Now this is prepared to occur beforehand, Acts 13:48, the to-be children of God were scattered before the gospel even reached them John 11:52

Romans 9
23 And that he might make known the riches of his glory on the vessels of mercy, which he had afore prepared unto glory,

24 Even us, whom he hath called, not of the Jews only, but also of the Gentiles?                                                                  

1 Corinthians
24 But unto them which are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God, and the wisdom of God.

other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; John 10:16

Ephesians 4

19 Who being past feeling have given themselves over unto lasciviousness, to work all uncleanness with greediness. 
20 But ye have not so learned Christ;

21 If so be that ye have heard him, and have been taught by him, as the truth is in Jesus:

Again, these are the elect, the called, the ones who seek God by faith, Jews and Gentiles. Only those receive the promises:

Isaiah 65

9 And I will bring forth a seed out of Jacob, and out of Judah an inheritor of my mountains: and mine elect shall inherit it, and my servants shall dwell there. 

10 And Sharon shall be a fold of flocks, and the valley of Achor a place for the herds to lie down in, for my people that have sought me.

Acts 2:39
For the promise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that are afar off, even as many as the LORD our God shall call.

Evidently from verses 1,2 we know that these are not the wicked reprobate jews, who sought righteousness through the law, their own righteousness Romans 10:1-3 , but the outwardly more sinful Gentiles and jewish publicans and sinners, who don't care for any righteousness, but are nevertheless unaware of the true God and not seeking him at all. The sinful jews and gentiles were not saved , because they had a more pure nature or will than the hypocrites, to the contrary, Romans 1 and Ephesians 4 state that they are even ignorant of the most obvious fact - that there is an invisible God and they consciously reject it.

30 What shall we say then? That the Gentiles, which followed not after righteousness, have attained to righteousness, even the righteousness which is of faith.     
31 But Israel, which followed after the law of righteousness, hath not attained to the law of righteousness. 

No predestinarian denies there is a will. But human will, since the Fall (when a host of curses befell our first parents), when Satan deceived Adam and Eve that its better to be "free" from the will of God, has only been inclined to evil. It can do no other, even if the faculty of reason isn't damaged as much as the will. The carnal mind in total can do nothing else, but rebel against God. One of the biggest curses is to be left to your own heart and will.

Psalms 81:12
So I gave them up unto their own hearts' lust: and they walked in their own counsels.